Dave Vam Ronk as a lad |
For me, the joy of the book rests in Van Ronk’s upbeat and
honest portrayal of himself and his milieu, his eye for detail and his love of
a good story. When he’s not sure his version of events is correct, he tells you
so and lets it rip. His tendency is to see the good in his fellow performers.
I’ve chosen a few observations to share with you today. To
start with one of the many life lessons that pop up in the book, here’s one
from the time Van Ronk, in his early 20s, finally landed a full-time gig in LA
of all places:
Dave Van Ronk in the 1960s |
“The first thing you noticed about Bobby in those days was
that he was full of nervous energy. We played quite a bit of chess, and his
knees would often be bouncing against the table so much that it was like being
at
a séance. . . . He had a lot of stories about who he was and where he came from, and he never seemed to be able to keep them straight. . . . His thinking is so convoluted that he simply does not know how to level, because he’s always thinking of the effect he’s having on whoever he’s talking to. But there was also something underlying all of that. For example, there was his genuine love for Woody Guthrie. I have heard him say he came to New York to ‘make it,’ but that’s bullshit. When he came to New York, there was no great folk music scene, no chance of making a career out of the sort of music we were doing. What he said at the time, and what I believe, was that he came because he had to meet Woody. Woody was already in very bad shape with Huntington’s chorea, and Bobby went out to the hospital and, by dint of some jiving and tap dancing, managed to get himself into his presence, and he sang for Woody, and he really did manage to develop a rapport with him. For a while, he was going out to the hospital quite often, and he would take his guitar up there and play for Woody. . . .
a séance. . . . He had a lot of stories about who he was and where he came from, and he never seemed to be able to keep them straight. . . . His thinking is so convoluted that he simply does not know how to level, because he’s always thinking of the effect he’s having on whoever he’s talking to. But there was also something underlying all of that. For example, there was his genuine love for Woody Guthrie. I have heard him say he came to New York to ‘make it,’ but that’s bullshit. When he came to New York, there was no great folk music scene, no chance of making a career out of the sort of music we were doing. What he said at the time, and what I believe, was that he came because he had to meet Woody. Woody was already in very bad shape with Huntington’s chorea, and Bobby went out to the hospital and, by dint of some jiving and tap dancing, managed to get himself into his presence, and he sang for Woody, and he really did manage to develop a rapport with him. For a while, he was going out to the hospital quite often, and he would take his guitar up there and play for Woody. . . .
“We all admired Woody and considered him a legend, but none
of us was trucking out to see him and play for him. In that regard, Dylan was
as stand-up a cat as I have ever known, and it was a very decent and impressive
beginning for anybody’s career.”
“The thing about Baez, though, was that like almost all the
women on the scene, she was still singing in the
style of the generation before us. It was a cultural lag: the boys had discovered Dock Boggs and Mississippi John Hurt, and the girls were still listening to Cynthia and Susan Reed. It was not just Joan. . . . All of them were singing bel canto – bad bel canto, by classical standards, but still bel canto. So whereas the boys were intentionally roughing up their voices, the girls were trying to sound prettier and prettier and more and more virginal. To a great extent, I think that had to do with making themselves desirable to the boys, and certainly the boys could have been more encouraging – we were all entranced by that virginal warble. But the result was that the women were still singing in the styles of the 1940s and 1950s, and that gave them a kind of crossover appeal to the people who were listening to Belafonte and the older singers, and to the clean-cut college groups.”
style of the generation before us. It was a cultural lag: the boys had discovered Dock Boggs and Mississippi John Hurt, and the girls were still listening to Cynthia and Susan Reed. It was not just Joan. . . . All of them were singing bel canto – bad bel canto, by classical standards, but still bel canto. So whereas the boys were intentionally roughing up their voices, the girls were trying to sound prettier and prettier and more and more virginal. To a great extent, I think that had to do with making themselves desirable to the boys, and certainly the boys could have been more encouraging – we were all entranced by that virginal warble. But the result was that the women were still singing in the styles of the 1940s and 1950s, and that gave them a kind of crossover appeal to the people who were listening to Belafonte and the older singers, and to the clean-cut college groups.”
“I got to know Paul and Artie pretty well. . . . When they
first showed up, they were in a pretty tough situation because they had already
had a Top 40 hit as teenagers, and as far as the music industry was
concerned, they were over the hill, but the mouldy fig wing of the folk industry despised them as pop singers. I remember hearing them down at the Gaslight, and no one would listen. . . . Their mainstream connections were still good enough to get them a contract with Columbia, but the first album went nowhere, and ‘Sounds of Silence’ actually became a running joke: for a while, it was only necessary to start singing, ‘Hello, darkness, my old friend. . .’ and everybody would crack up. It was a complete failure, and they had gone their separate ways – Paul had fled to London and Artie was going back to grad school to become a professor of mathematics – but then someone at Columbia did some studio alchemy, overdubbed a few electric guitars and whatnot, and it became one of the seminal folk-rock hits.”
concerned, they were over the hill, but the mouldy fig wing of the folk industry despised them as pop singers. I remember hearing them down at the Gaslight, and no one would listen. . . . Their mainstream connections were still good enough to get them a contract with Columbia, but the first album went nowhere, and ‘Sounds of Silence’ actually became a running joke: for a while, it was only necessary to start singing, ‘Hello, darkness, my old friend. . .’ and everybody would crack up. It was a complete failure, and they had gone their separate ways – Paul had fled to London and Artie was going back to grad school to become a professor of mathematics – but then someone at Columbia did some studio alchemy, overdubbed a few electric guitars and whatnot, and it became one of the seminal folk-rock hits.”
No comments:
Post a Comment